Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Frannie and Freddie, just two crazy kids

Just before the housing collapse I started selling mortgages. The prime was around four and if you had “excellent” credit and a job you could get the best rate. The office was like a setting in a John Steinbeck story. It was seedy in that it was so undernourished. The only computer was on the “boss’” desk which when he finally strolled in, mid-morning, he would spend rest of the time till lunch greedily gawking porn sites. If we wanted to check someone’s credit rating, we waited till he was off. I’m pretty sure he was in the witness protection program because he did very little in the way of sales and his piece of what we did would barely keep his Harley in gas.

I was encouraged to bring in whatever business was out there and when ever I did latch on to something I was told “we don’t do that, yet.” One of them was a reverse mortgage for a friend of mine which even though it finally went through, the jagoff company never paid me for it. Then I went to work for the subsidiary of IndyMac that was pushing these things. IndyMac, 10th largest bank in CA, just shut their doors.

The concept is basic biz: if you can afford it you can have it. But as Jon Stewart said last night to some twit who had written a book about it, “So if I can’t afford it, you’ll still give it to me but just charge me more.” Laughs from the audience, a look of bewilderment from the expert.

What is unclear to me is why the mortgage bankers would loan money to losers. Not just the guy who wants to put a trailer he has been given on wetlands that his father-in-law sold him for $25K, but our little company in general. I remember Billy who had been in car sales talking on the phone to customer while emitting an occasional glorp of goo from his mouth into a coffee cup. Paul wanted me to help him sell modular homes but the only mortgage he sold while I was there was to his father. John had the most sales because he had seniority and would cherry pick the lists to cold call so that the rest of us would be calling people who had just refinanced, sometimes not even six months before.

If this company could get qualified to sell mortgages, it is absolutely no wonder that the system was and is chock a block with avaricious arseholes who’d figured a way to scam whoever came along. And then the guys just above us were in it so that they could bundle these sales and pass them on until Japan ends up with them.

So what happens when Schmucko goes away to the county lock up for a few months leaving his pregnant bride with the kids, and no car to get to a job? He defaults. Now my old company does not say “Schmuckey, we might have over extended you a tad and rates are still low, how about you give us a little less for the next few years till this thing blows over.” They don’t say that because they can’t. They’re not holding. And who is holding is who gets stuck when the payments stop coming in. Screw them. But apparently not. The government finds some way to help out the big shots at Fannie and Freddie, but the Schmuckster loses his house and any credit he might have had. Why not have the bailout for the little guy who can then keep making his payments and the money continues to go up the food chain? I’m just sayin’.

2 comments:

  1. http://www.globeinvestor.com/servlet/story/GAM.20080719.RCOVER19/GIStory/ This is a decent article on the subject. It's all about profit and wrongly assessing risk i that some idiots thought the real estate market would keep going up. The losers who got into houses they couldn't afford would have been foreclosed on or would have had to sell their houses to pay off their loans and had values continued climbing, there would have been no lack of money to pay off the mortgage loans on the houses. But the values came crashing downwards in a big way, the collateral for the mortgages lost its value and investors down the line were left holding the bag. A lot of due diligence wasn't done because the loans were sold and sold and sold again in various bundled weird securities, each time further removed from reality etc. There is no choice but to support Fannie and Freddie--but the taxpayers will pay. A good argument for tax reform--spread the pain to include more income of the wealthy folks. The government can't bail out individuals who made bad decisions about investing in a mortgage. But there ought to be a loan program that offers such people some sort of financing package to get them some help.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "What is unclear to me is why the mortgage bankers would loan money to losers."

    C'mon Petey-Poo... any ten-year-old with a lemonade stand knows the answer to that non-question: $$G$R$E$E$D$$!!

    Allow me to illustrate the point...

    Back in the 60's my "friend" Jack commanded a squadron of glue-sniffers and Romilar-chuggers who he would send out to steal and scam on his behalf. He was a pied piper for the damaged and diminished youth of my suburban Inferno- kind of a Charlie Manson without the sadistic violence.

    Anyway, one of Jack's favorite cons was gathering up lawn clippings, stuffing them into baggies and having his zombie minions sell the oversize lids of "weed" to the area droolers and retards for $10 instead of the going $20. His customer base was so juiced up on trash highs all day and night that they couldn't distinguish between real pot and lawn weeds!

    The cops eventually busted him, but he unsurprisingly skated on the charges- chlorophyll was not on the list of controlled substances.

    He made a ton of money by victimizing the ignorant with total impunity.. that is until one of his acolytes made the mistake of selling a shitload of lids to a local biker who literally crucified the poor idiot with a crossbow, nailing him to a wall until he dimed on Jack. When Jack was released from the hospital after a hellacious beating (and making full restitution plus vig) he went right back to work.

    Now back then, nobody would have allowed a guy like Jack (a convicted felon, known thief and drug dealer) access to the world of mortgages and financial instruments with which to scam and defraud the public...but the advent of the Reagan revolution of deregulation and the god-like supremacy of the unfettered free market has spawned a pestilence of Jacks with no checks on their voracious greed.

    As a matter of fact, I'm sure that today Jack would be in line for a hefty taxpayer-financed bailout while his victims died on the street from eating out of dumpsters.

    Ahh the miracle of Commerce!

    ReplyDelete