Thursday, October 2, 2008

Bad Ass ets

The Senate has now passed the bill from hell and we don’t yet know what Congress will do. They surprised us last time. More importantly, I don’t know what I’d do if I had to vote right now and I’ve heard the arguments for both sides. I still feel so strongly that there will be obscene amounts of money stolen out of the bill from the money monsters who will game this piece of business to a fare thee well.

Already the senate version has tax breaks for Puerto Rican rum producers and some “wooden arrows for kids” company in Oregon. I kid you not. It was for $7 mill. If Ted Stevens wasn’t in court yesterday, for supposedly taking bribes, you can be sure he would have grabbed a taste. The purpose of these sweeteners is to sway the votes of the left or right side of the aisle. If these schmucks won’t stand up now for the right thing to do for their country without being bribed, when will they? It is almost impossible to comprehend the selfish and stupid thinking that makes these people tick. They seem to be proudest of their contributions to political gamesmanship and what they can get away with, but are absolutely spineless when it comes to their duty to make the best decision.

One interesting point is that the voters “seem” to be overwhelmingly against it though I heard a pollster yesterday that said that it was more like 45% that want the “rescue plan.” (“Bailout” being too strong a term for voters who will be easily tricked by this nuance.) And some congress members have claimed that they are voting with their constituents in mind. That should be good. But someone else has pointed out that individual members are sent to congress to do what we cannot do and that is to access and assess the information and do what’s best for the country. They know the little tricks of wording in the bill. They know what the pitfalls down the pike will be. They know the people to ask when they don’t know.

The Monday vote being so close in a 435 person chamber does nothing to clarify which is the way to go. I am instinctively opposed to giving the government this much rope. I do not trust the administration to do the right thing. I am fearful of Jim Cramer’s assessment of Bernanke and Paulson as being the wrong people for the job. But I am equally fearful that if the liquidity markets fail, it becomes a world wide problem.

McCain says he would “fix the system.” But he voted for the Senate versions with the goofball earmarks. He claims “this bill will prevent financial disaster” but cautions that “it is just a tourniquet.” That makes me wonder how much the actual operation will cost. Obama voted for it. And the coin canny Warren Buffet has said that he will buy $3 billion of the bad-ass assets. But even there, you know he’s just skimming the cream and leaving the taxpayers with the toxic wasteland that is the worst of the worst.

What would you do?

8 comments:

  1. The credit has to start flowing--if no one is lending, the effects go everywhere--trickle down bad effects. Read Tom Friedman in the NYT yesterday. Hank Paulson is a stand-up decent honest guy, and we shouldn't smear him with Bushism.

    The stupid things the Senate added are just an effort to make the House vote for it. The increase to 250,000 FDIC insurance is a good idea.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What would I do? Let me count the scheckles. Kind of "not so bright" to do nothing. Yes, bills that pass have pork in them. That's life.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I am more than a little leary when the original bailout proposal by Sec. Paulson grows from 3 pages to over 450 pages. Coming out of the Senate, as it did, in only a couple of days with a religious observance in there. Makes me wonder how much of the bill was already in the hopper?
    Wait till the House morphs what they want into this abomination. It will be 900 pages! and a trillion plus...
    Seems to me a rather simple problem to fix:

    1. Require Fred/Fan to buy only paper that has mortgages with 20% downpayments. Better yet, get rid of Fred/Fan.
    2. Change the accounting rules that require investment holders to write off the entire mortgage value if the loan defaults.
    3. Require that the Fed. Bankruptcy court(s) have limited durational powers to work out problem loans (if possible).
    4. Let those loans that can't be worked out default and the ownership return to the mortgage holders.
    5. Increase the FDIC coverage.
    6. Lower the capital gains tax rate.
    7. Lower the corporate tax rate.
    8. Drill here drill now.
    9. 'Manhatten Project' effort for energy independance in 10 years.

    Don't forget, we will have Social Security and Medicare going bankrupt in 12-15 years.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How bout this scenario:
    Feds buy the bad mortgages (notice the word "mort" in mortgage)for the $.30 on the $1.00 as proposed. Work with the people who have trouble making their payments to stabilize the real estate market and when the market recovers, sell the forclosed real estate for $.50 or $.75 or $1.25 on the $1.00. We all make $$.

    ReplyDelete
  5. How about we take the assets of everyone that profited from selling these bogus mortages including those from Carroll County and use those assets to fund the bailout.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Halfway measures such as multi-trillion dollar bailouts just won't do. We need to round up the CEO and CFO of every corporate entity that participated materially in the massive fraud that resulted in the wholesale looting of the US Treasury and the anal rape of the American investor.

    This rogue's gallery of miscreants would include those who developed and propagated the genre of mortgages that include subprime, Alt A, interest only, no money down, no credit or employment checks and jumbo balloons. (Don't worry Pete- reverse mortgage purveyors would not be in this group)

    The next level of this sociopathic kleptocracy would comprise the investment banks who purchased these pieces of steaming excrement, then shredded, flaked and reformed them to create the Frankensteinian CDOs, SIVs, auction rate securities and other toxic "investment vehicles" that were subsequently sold off to investment portfolios around the globe, spreading like a drug resistant bacteria into every corner of the financial polity- from Mom and Dad through local, state and national pension funds and all the way to the treasuries of most countries.

    Oh-and let's not forget the ratings agencies and insurers who knowingly provided cover for this radioactive shitstorm by guaranteeing the legitimacy of its value.

    None of these malefactors ever had the merest fraction of reserves to cover their losses when the stench became overwhelming and the whole sorry mess inevitably collapsed.

    Of course this entire mess unfolded under the very gaze of our elected cadavers, who took the big payoffs to look the other way.

    So we assemble these unrepentant felons in the nation's capital, shackle them together and frog march them, Bataan-like, down Route 95, their every agonized lurch followed by TV helicopters- same as OJ- all the way to Miami.

    Then they get loaded onto a US Navy prison boat and "softened up" in the dank holds while they sail for Guantanamo. Once ashore in our Cuban fortress, they are classified as enemy combatants and subjected to stress positions, sleep deprivation and thermal extremes- everything short of "death and/or organ failure" (as the Yoo doctrine defines as "not torture"), then interrogated repeatedly by our best CIA black site persuaders until they reveal the location of every last centavo that they stole from us.

    I think the American taxpayer could see a tidy return on this investment, and the entertainment value would be priceless!

    This is my inspiration for the preceding rant.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Pre-debate musing. . .
    Will we see the same old Grumpy McNasty or witness the breach birth of Hans McKKKain in Nashville tonight?

    ReplyDelete